Web 3.0

Why Web3 isn’t the privacy panacea we think it is

  • Running on blockchain, Web3 is expected to revolutionize the internet by changing the ownership and power of private data to the users.
  • Some experts reckon due to its lack of central control and access to data, Web3 could make it even more difficult to police cybercrime.

The Internet that most of us are a part of today is known as the Web2 — a place where we are beholden to centralized entities who control the flow of information while monopolizing and profiting off our data. The era of Web2, as some claim, may soon come to an end as we have recently reached the critical juncture of a newer, more decentralized internet known as the Web3.

The term Web3 or Web 3.0 has been garnering much of the online world’s attention lately. While it is not something new, it is at its core, the future of the internet that promotes decentralized concepts mainly to reduce dependency on Big Tech like Meta, Google and Amazon. In fact, last month, Opera had launched a beta version of its “Crypto Browser Project”  — an internet browser with built-in Web3 integrations.

Proponents argue that web3 will improve user privacy by putting individuals in control of their data, via distributed personal data stores. But critics say that the transparent nature of public distributed ledgers, which make transactions visible to all participants, is antithetical to privacy.

The duality of Web3: Privacy or transparency? 

For starters, the term Web3 was first coined by Gavin Wood eight years ago. In a 2014 blog post, Wood reckoned how “entrusting our information to organizations in general is a fundamentally broken model.” He basically sold the idea that the future of the internet is a place where ownership and power are more widely and evenly distributed. 

Recommended:  Rockstar confirms hack after Grand Theft Auto 6 leak

To be precise, Wood’s vision is based on transparent digital ledgers known as blockchains — the technology that underpins cryptocurrencies — and with that, ‘Big Tech’ companies will be rivaled by more democratized forms of internet governance, where the user will get a say. “Web 3.0, or as might be termed the “post-Snowden” web, is a re-imagination of the sorts of things we already use the web for, but with a fundamentally different model for the interactions between parties,” he said.

Elaborating further on this, he added, “Information that we assume to be public, we publish. Information we assume to be agreed upon, we place on a consensus ledger. Information that we assume to be private, we keep secret and never reveal. Communication always takes place over encrypted channels and only with pseudonymous identities as endpoints; never with anything traceable (such as IP addresses).”

In short, Web3 promises to release us from the shackles of tech giants by enabling everyone to access data living on the blockchain. While it is certainly appealing that institutions no longer have the power to hold our data hostage, it is still important to consider: what does the public and transparent nature of web3 mean for our privacy?

To some, like the Private blockchain The Secrecy Network’s co-founder Tor Bair, “Web3 requires you to give up privacy entirely. NFTs and blockchains are all public-by-default and terrible for ownership and security.” 

Separately, according to a blog posting by the National University of Singapore (NUS), data security concerns are not eliminated completely with Web3. “Security issues on the next Internet phase go beyond data. For example, transacting anonymously on distributed ledgers currently comes with risks such as smart contract logic hacks and the lack of legal protection when things go wrong,” it said.

Recommended:  Researchers Quietly Cracked Zeppelin Ransomware Keys

When it comes to the privacy legislation perspective, decentralization simply makes it difficult to identify the personally identifiable information (PII) controller and the PII processor, NUS believes. “Due to its lack of central control and access to data, Web 3.0 could make it even more difficult to police cybercrime, including online harassment, hate speech and child abuse images,” the blog posting reads.

NUS reckons regulators, businesses, and even consumers alike will have to start rethinking about how cybersecurity and privacy issues are handled through the lens of Web3–to keep pace with the evolving landscape.

Suggest an edit to this article

Go to Cybersecurity Knowledge Base

Got to the Latest Cybersecurity News

Go to Cybersecurity Academy

Go to Homepage

Stay informed of the latest Cybersecurity trends, threats and developments. Sign up for our Weekly Cybersecurity Newsletter Today.

Remember, CyberSecurity Starts With You!

  • Globally, 30,000 websites are hacked daily.
  • 64% of companies worldwide have experienced at least one form of a cyber attack.
  • There were 20M breached records in March 2021.
  • In 2020, ransomware cases grew by 150%.
  • Email is responsible for around 94% of all malware.
  • Every 39 seconds, there is a new attack somewhere on the web.
  • An average of around 24,000 malicious mobile apps are blocked daily on the internet.
Bookmark
RiSec.n0tst3
Connect
Latest posts by RiSec.n0tst3 (see all)
Recommended:  US court system suffered 'incredibly significant attack' – sealed files at risk
Share the word, let's increase Cybersecurity Awareness as we know it

2 thoughts on “Why Web3 isn’t the privacy panacea we think it is”

  1. Pingback: Why Web3 isn’t the privacy panacea we think it is | FreeScotland News

  2. I have read so many posts about the blogger lovers howeverthis post is really a good piece of writing, keep it up.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RiSec Captcha 28 − 23 =