Skip to content
RealinfoSec.net

RealinfoSec.net

InfoSec News, Cybersecurity Awareness

  • Home
  • InfoSec News
    • Data Breach News
    • Latest Vulnerabilities
  • What Is InfoSec
  • CyberSecurity Newsletter
  • Cyber Academy
  • Cyber Help Desk
  • Cyber Knowledge Base
  • Contact Us
    • Contribute
  • My Bookmarks
  • Subscribers
    • Knowledge Quizzes
    • Register
  • Login
    • Password Reset
  • Register
  • Privacy Policy
    • Legal
  • Toggle search form

Scientists may have found the first water worlds

Posted on 17 December 202217 December 2022 By RiSec.Mitch No Comments on Scientists may have found the first water worlds

Table of Contents

  • Let’s revisit that
  • Revisions upon revisions
  • Water, water, everywhere
    • Please login to bookmark

Two planets that were originally discovered by the Kepler mission may not be what we thought they were. Based on an initial characterization, it was thought these planets were rocky bodies a bit larger than Earth. But continued observation has produced data that indicates the planets are much less dense than we originally thought. And the only realistic way to get the sort of densities they now seem to have is for a substantial amount of their volume to be occupied by water or a similar fluid.

We do have bodies like this in our Solar System—most notably the moon Europa, which has a rocky core surrounded by a watery shell capped by ice. But these new planets are much closer to their host star, which means their surfaces are probably a blurry boundary between a vast ocean and a steam-filled atmosphere.

Let’s revisit that

There are two main methods for finding an exoplanet. One is to watch for dips in the light from their star, caused by planets with an orbit that takes them between the star and Earth. The second is to track whether the star’s light periodically shifts to redder or bluer wavelengths, caused by the star moving due to the gravitational pull of orbiting planets.

Either of those methods can tell us whether or not a planet is present. But having both gives us a lot of information about the planet. The amount of light blocked by the planet can give us an estimate of its size. The amount of red- and blue-shifting of the star’s light can indicate the planet’s mass. With both of those, we can find out its density. And density limits what sorts of materials it can be composed of—low density means rich in gas, high density means rocky with a metal-rich core.

That’s exactly what we were able to do at the Kepler-138 system. Data from both these methods suggested that the system contains three planets. Kepler-138b appears to be a small, Mars-sized rocky body. Kepler-138c and Kepler-138d both fell into the category of super-Earths: rocky planets that were somewhat larger than Earth and considerably more massive. All of them orbited quite close to Kepler-138a, a red dwarf star, with the most distant (Kepler-138d) orbiting at 0.15 astronomical units (an AU is the typical distance between Earth and the Sun).

Recommended:  Wholesale giant METRO confirmed to have suffered a cyberattack

In the grand scheme of things, there was nothing unusual about this system that would demand a second look. But researchers thought that it made a good candidate for studies of the planet’s atmospheres. While the planet will block all light as it transits in front of its host star, a small amount of light will pass through the atmosphere on its way to Earth. And the molecules in that atmosphere will absorb some specific wavelengths, allowing us to discern their presence.

To perform that study, a team of researchers obtained data from the Hubble and Spitzer space telescopes, timed for when Kepler-138d was transiting in front of the star. And that’s when things started to get weird.

Revisions upon revisions

With three planets packed into a small area near the red dwarf, they’re close enough to each other that they can influence their orbits. These create what are called “transit timing variations,” meaning that a planet doesn’t show up in front of its host start at exactly the time its orbit would normally take it there. For example, one of the planets might be in a position where its gravitational pull will slow down another, causing its transit to start a bit later than calculations might otherwise suggest.

This can provide limits for planet mass estimates, as well, so precise measurements of transit timing variations are good to have. And, because the Hubble and Spitzer observations came quite a while after the Kepler data, it meant that we could calculate variations across a seven-year span.

As it turned out, however, we couldn’t. If you estimated the masses based on Kepler measurements and then tried to use that to predict the transits in later measurements, you’d fail. In fact, everything was messed up. “No three-planet model can simultaneously reproduce the Kepler, HST, and Spitzer transit times of Kepler-138 d,” the researchers conclude.

That probably seems awkward. But if a three-planet model failed, the researchers had an obvious backup: trying a four-planet model instead. And that managed to make sense of the data. It also provided an estimate of the fourth planet’s location and mass: about half the size of Earth, orbiting roughly 0.2 astronomical units from the star. The planet, Kepler-138e, doesn’t appear to transit in front of the host star, so its presence hasn’t been confirmed yet.

Recommended:  Hackers Use Cloud Services to Distribute Nanocore, Netwire, and AsyncRAT Malware

Assuming it’s accurate, however, the presence of Kepler-138e has consequences. It would also be exerting a gravitational pull on the star, which would contribute to all the red and blue shifts in the star’s light that were used to determine the mass of the other planets. So all of the mass estimates based on the earlier data had to be completely revised in light of the presence of another planet. And things continued to get weird when that was done.

Water, water, everywhere

The two larger planets, Kepler-138c and Kepler-138d, were originally thought to be quite different: both rocky but with metal cores that differed greatly in size. With the revised measurements, however, they were essentially twins. And they were considerably less dense than the earlier estimates.

One way for that to work is if they have a large, hydrogen-rich atmosphere. But the planets are so close to their host star that this isn’t a viable option; radiation from the star is intense enough that the atmosphere would be stripped away within 50 million years, and the system is estimated to be over a billion years old.

An alternative is a planet rich in what are called volatiles, things like water or ammonia that can be found as gases, ices, and liquids under the conditions found in different parts of the Solar System. While a number of potential chemicals could account for the planets’ density, the researchers think in terms of water since there are several water-rich worlds in our Solar System, most notably Jupiter’s moon, Europa.

Matching the density of the two planets produces a model that has a bit over 10 percent of the planet’s mass composed of water. This, however, means that about half the planet’s volume is water. While some of that might be incorporated into the rocky core, it likely means a planet-wide ocean that’s kilometers deep. And, unlike the icy moons, the planet is close enough that much of the water would be liquid, and the atmosphere would be filled with water vapor. Due to the planet’s mass, the pressure of the atmosphere would be immense and could create a layer of supercritical water between the atmosphere and the ocean.

The water-filled moons of the outer Solar System are easy to explain, because they formed in a region where water would exist as ice, and thus could condense onto smaller bodies that merged to form the moons. But these planets are orbiting in an area where water is either liquid or, more likely, remains gaseous. How could they possibly form?

Recommended:  Killnet hackers announce Russian cyber attacks on UK for standing up to Putin's war

The researchers suggest that the orbital periods of the planets provide a clue. They are in resonance, meaning that the ratios of their orbital period can be expressed as a ratio of two single-digit numbers (i.e., 5:3). Resonant orbits are considered stable, as the regular gravitational interactions among the planets keep them from getting out of alignment. So the researchers suggest that the planets likely formed in an area of their exosolar system where ice predominated and then migrated inward toward the star until the resonance stabilized their orbits and stopped the migration.

Obviously, given that we haven’t confirmed that a fourth planet exists, there’s a lot here that needs to be verified before we can be comfortable saying we’ve definitely found water worlds. But even in its current tentative state, the results suggest that there’s still a lot of potential for new findings in places where the data seemed to point to a rather run-of-the-mill collection of planets. Given that Kepler identified thousands of exosolar systems like that, there seems to be immense potential for revisiting data and looking for surprises.

Nature Astronomy, 2022. DOI: 10.1038/s41550-022-01835-4  (About DOIs).

Suggest an edit to this article

Cybersecurity Knowledge Base

Homepage

Remember, CyberSecurity Starts With You!

  • Globally, 30,000 websites are hacked daily.
  • 64% of companies worldwide have experienced at least one form of a cyber attack.
  • There were 20M breached records in March 2021.
  • In 2020, ransomware cases grew by 150%.
  • Email is responsible for around 94% of all malware.
  • Every 39 seconds, there is a new attack somewhere on the web.
  • An average of around 24,000 malicious mobile apps are blocked daily on the internet.
Bookmark

Please login to bookmark

Social Comments Box
  • About
  • Latest Posts
RiSec.Mitch
Just your average information security researcher from Delaware US.
Latest posts by RiSec.Mitch (see all)
  • Google Open-Source Vulnerability Scanning Tool - 18 January 2023
  • Polymorphic Malware Produced by ChatGPT - 18 January 2023
  • Russian Hackers Repurpose Decade-Old Malware Infrastructure to Deploy New Backdoors - 8 January 2023
Share the word, let's increase Cybersecurity Awareness as we know it

No related articles.

InfoSec News, World Affairs Tags:Science, Space

Post navigation

Previous Post: Microsoft discovers Windows/Linux botnet used in DDoS attacks
Next Post: Bangresta 1.0 SQL Injection

Related Posts

Russian-Backed Hackers attacked a “major” oil refinery in a NATO Country InfoSec News
Harmony FEDS investigating $100 million theft from blockchain company Harmony Data Security
war War and Inflation Threaten World Economy InfoSec News
Analyzing Phishing attacks Analyzing Phishing Attacks that use malicious PDFs Cybersecurity Academy
data security TA558 cybercrime group targets hospitality and travel orgs InfoSec News
InfoSec News LastPass finally admits attackers have a copy of customers’ password vaults Data Security

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RiSec Captcha 7 + 1 =

AbuseIPDB Contributor Badge

Follow Our Socials:

Latest InfoSec News

Data Breach News InfoSec News

JD Sports: Cyber Attack affects 10 million customers

RiSec.n0tst3
30 January 2023 0
what is infosec
Cybersecurity Academy

InfoSec – A Newbie Guide – InfoSecurity

RiSec.n0tst3
25 January 2023 0
google
Cybersecurity Academy How to

Google Open-Source Vulnerability Scanning Tool

RiSec.Mitch
18 January 2023 0
InfoSec News

Polymorphic Malware Produced by ChatGPT

RiSec.Mitch
18 January 2023 0
russia
InfoSec News

Russian Hackers Repurpose Decade-Old Malware Infrastructure to Deploy New Backdoors

RiSec.Mitch
8 January 2023 0
latest cybersecurity news
InfoSec News

Dridex Banking Malware Targets MacOS users with a new delivery method

RiSec.Mitch
8 January 2023 0
ransomware
InfoSec News

Microsoft Discloses Methods Employed by 4 Ransomware Families Aiming at macOS

RiSec.Mitch
8 January 2023 0
InfoSec News

$8 billion in cryptocurrency withdrawals strike US bank Silvergate

RiSec.Mitch
8 January 2023 0

Featured Posts

cve-2022-38970
Data Security Featured How to InfoSec News Vulnerabilities

ieGeek Security Vulnerabilities still prevalent in 2022 IG20

RiSec.n0tst3
28 August 2022 6
Data Security Featured InfoSec News

Hacking Campaign Steals 10,000 Login Credentials From 130 Different Organizations

RiSec.n0tst3
27 August 2022 0
DDoS
Featured InfoSec News

Google mitigates largest DDoS Attack in History – Peaked at 46 Million RPS

RiSec.n0tst3
19 August 2022 1
Security researcher contacted me
Cybersecurity Academy Featured How to

A Security Researcher Contacted Me – What should I do?

RiSec.n0tst3
30 June 2022 0
google chrome
Featured InfoSec News

Google Chrome extensions can be easily fingerprinted to track you online

RiSec.n0tst3
19 June 2022 0
MFA
Cybersecurity Academy Data Security Featured

3 Steps To Better Account Security

RiSec.n0tst3
21 February 2022 0
hardening vps security
Cybersecurity Academy Featured

HARDEN YOUR VPS: Steps to Hardening your VPS Security

RiSec.n0tst3
10 January 2022 2

Share the joy

Copyright © 2022 RealinfoSec.net. CyberSecurity News & Awareness. All Trademarks, Logos And Brand Names Are The Property Of Their Respective Owners

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of the cookies. Cookie & Privacy Policy
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
en English
af Afrikaanssq Albanianam Amharicar Arabichy Armenianaz Azerbaijanieu Basquebe Belarusianbn Bengalibs Bosnianbg Bulgarianca Catalanceb Cebuanony Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)co Corsicanhr Croatiancs Czechda Danishnl Dutchen Englisheo Esperantoet Estoniantl Filipinofi Finnishfr Frenchfy Frisiangl Galicianka Georgiande Germanel Greekgu Gujaratiht Haitian Creoleha Hausahaw Hawaiianiw Hebrewhi Hindihmn Hmonghu Hungarianis Icelandicig Igboid Indonesianga Irishit Italianja Japanesejw Javanesekn Kannadakk Kazakhkm Khmerko Koreanku Kurdish (Kurmanji)ky Kyrgyzlo Laola Latinlv Latvianlt Lithuanianlb Luxembourgishmk Macedonianmg Malagasyms Malayml Malayalammt Maltesemi Maorimr Marathimn Mongolianmy Myanmar (Burmese)ne Nepalino Norwegianps Pashtofa Persianpl Polishpt Portuguesepa Punjabiro Romanianru Russiansm Samoangd Scottish Gaelicsr Serbianst Sesothosn Shonasd Sindhisi Sinhalask Slovaksl Slovenianso Somalies Spanishsu Sudanesesw Swahilisv Swedishtg Tajikta Tamilte Teluguth Thaitr Turkishuk Ukrainianur Urduuz Uzbekvi Vietnamesecy Welshxh Xhosayi Yiddishyo Yorubazu Zulu